Visit Our Sponsors

NY Sports Day Forums

Subscribe to NY Sportscene Magazine

Go Back   NY Sports Day Forums > Mets Online Fan Forum > New York Mets
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Visit Our Sponsors


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-30-2008, 06:07 PM   #31 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
No.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Home of a MLS Cup Finalist
Posts: 5,445
Send a message via AIM to No.1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MetfanBren View Post
Don't you think CC is a bit of a risk for six years and $20 million, which he could probably get more than?
Probably?! Look at Santana's deal. He's getting 20M next year alone. And his payroll's going up by the year. Of course CC's getting more.
  Reply With Quote

Want fewer adverts? -Join NY Sportsday's Forums
Old 09-30-2008, 06:08 PM   #32 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
FrankStylV7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Up your Mom's filthy snatch
Posts: 6,888
Default

As much as I love CC in a completely heterosexual male non-erotic way - his workload and weight in recent years screams breakdown a la Bartolo Colon.
__________________
meta is meruder. sweete delivious mruedure.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 06:12 PM   #33 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Deepleft34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Wilpons are broke!
Posts: 2,077
Default

Quote:
1972 - Present: Sterling Equities (SE) was founded by Fred Wilpon & Saul Katz as a vehicle to develop and invest in real estate. Since 1972 SE and its affiliates have purchased or developed over 17.0 million SF of commercial property, 45,000 residential units, 8.5 million SF of retail property and three major sports complexes. SE has evolved over the last three decades into a diverse family of companies focused on the creation of wealth and preservation of capital.
$600 million annually. Nah, they are broke.
__________________
I'm Deepleft34 and I approve this post.

The answer to any question in the English language:

How about Roberto Alomar? and,
Fixed
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 06:12 PM   #34 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Deepleft34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Wilpons are broke!
Posts: 2,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankStylV7 View Post
As much as I love CC in a completely heterosexual male non-erotic way - his workload and weight in recent years screams breakdown a la Bartolo Colon.
Saying that does make sense.

Saying the Mets don't have the money makes you look foolish.
__________________
I'm Deepleft34 and I approve this post.

The answer to any question in the English language:

How about Roberto Alomar? and,
Fixed
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 06:14 PM   #35 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
No.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Home of a MLS Cup Finalist
Posts: 5,445
Send a message via AIM to No.1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deepleft34 View Post
$600 million annually. Nah, they are broke.
Yes. THAT'S what I said.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 06:15 PM   #36 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Deepleft34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Wilpons are broke!
Posts: 2,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MetfanBren View Post
Don't you think CC is a bit of a risk for six years and $20 million, which he could probably get more than? The guy ain't getting any skinnier, and his arm isn't getting any less abused. Nobody can say how these things will work out because they could change any second, but I would feel a lot more confident in Santana's ability to stay healthy than CC's. He's a piece of meat to the Brewers, and that's how they've treated him...

As for Burnett, that one has disaster written all over it. He hasn't earned his contract from Toronto, and now you want to give him even more years at a much larger salary when he's three years older?
My feeling is that w/ the Yanks missing the playoffs, the Dodgers (who aren't going to win it all, but come close) getting better, the Angels (who are probably lose to the Cubs) also interested...that those guys mentioned are going to get paid BIG TIME.

Of Course I don't like CC's work load this year, but surround him with type flight, quality starters and maybe he actually gets the rest he needs.

I have always beena fan of Burnett and SOMEONE is going to entice him with a big contract...why not us.
__________________
I'm Deepleft34 and I approve this post.

The answer to any question in the English language:

How about Roberto Alomar? and,
Fixed
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 06:20 PM   #37 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Deepleft34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Wilpons are broke!
Posts: 2,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No.1 View Post
Yes. THAT'S what I said.
No, this is what you said

Quote:
Originally Posted by by someone who apparently does need 10 years exp.
Gee, I don't know maybe because THIS ISN'T ****ING MONOPOLY DUMB***!! The ownership isn't the Yankees organization. They don't have that kind of money even WITH the new stadium
Just peruse this website:
Sterling Equities

It'll make you sick just how much money the Wilpons have. I'd gather to say they may have more money than the Steinbrenner's. The Steinbrenner's make a boatload of their money off of the Yankees, though. The Wilpon's make enough off of the Mets to satisfy the balance sheet...and that is what pisses me off about not spending money and confounds nme when people like yourself say this organization DOESN'T have the $$$.
__________________
I'm Deepleft34 and I approve this post.

The answer to any question in the English language:

How about Roberto Alomar? and,
Fixed
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 06:27 PM   #38 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
No.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Home of a MLS Cup Finalist
Posts: 5,445
Send a message via AIM to No.1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deepleft34 View Post
No, this is what you said



Just peruse this website:
Sterling Equities

It'll make you sick just how much money the Wilpons have. I'd gather to say they may have more money than the Steinbrenner's. The Steinbrenner's make a boatload of their money off of the Yankees, though. The Wilpon's make enough off of the Mets to satisfy the balance sheet...and that is what pisses me off about not spending money and confounds nme when people like yourself say this organization DOESN'T have the $$$.
Again, they don't have that kind of money to pay three pitchers who will cost 25+mil, 20+, and 18+ mil a year. You can show all the money they make over their real estate company. There is a reason why the Yanks are the only team spending 200 million while many teams who are making just as much as Wilpon or more isn't coming close to 150mil. Wake up. Only the Yanks spend like the Yanks.


And that's just the Wilpon's own money. Those other teams you mentioned...will want those pitchers and are damn willing to pay much more than the Mets want. Furthermore, This team as TOO many problems to do that.

Your plan IS fantasy baseball at best.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 06:35 PM   #39 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pearl River, NY
Posts: 3,666
Send a message via AIM to MetfanBren
Default

Supposedly CC wants to play on the West Coast. If I were the Angels and I couldn't sign K-Rod and Teixeira I'd make a major play for him. They have a great pen they can find a closer in, and they're still very high on Kendry Morales at 1B. Moreno can compete with the Yankees with all that coming off the books if he wants too...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 07:13 PM   #40 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Deepleft34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Wilpons are broke!
Posts: 2,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No.1 View Post
Again, they don't have that kind of money to pay three pitchers who will cost 25+mil, 20+, and 18+ mil a year. You can show all the money they make over their real estate company. There is a reason why the Yanks are the only team spending 200 million while many teams who are making just as much as Wilpon or more isn't coming close to 150mil. Wake up. Only the Yanks spend like the Yanks.


And that's just the Wilpon's own money. Those other teams you mentioned...will want those pitchers and are damn willing to pay much more than the Mets want. Furthermore, This team as TOO many problems to do that.

Your plan IS fantasy baseball at best.
Wah, only the yanks, Wah!
I think a PAyroll of $150 million is fair to ask in today's world w/ what the Wilpons are making.
Aside from pitching a LF, what other problems haven't I covered in this thread? I can ask the Wilpon's to sell to someone WILLING to spend their dough...but that would be another thread.
__________________
I'm Deepleft34 and I approve this post.

The answer to any question in the English language:

How about Roberto Alomar? and,
Fixed
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 07:15 PM   #41 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Deepleft34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Wilpons are broke!
Posts: 2,077
Default

Also, I think I tried to cover OTHER teams wanting the same pitchers by putting VERY HIGH price tags on the people I mentioned, meaning the Mets would have won the bidding war.
__________________
I'm Deepleft34 and I approve this post.

The answer to any question in the English language:

How about Roberto Alomar? and,
Fixed
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 07:18 PM   #42 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Deepleft34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Wilpons are broke!
Posts: 2,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MetfanBren View Post
Don't you think CC is a bit of a risk for six years and $20 million, which he could probably get more than? The guy ain't getting any skinnier, and his arm isn't getting any less abused. Nobody can say how these things will work out because they could change any second, but I would feel a lot more confident in Santana's ability to stay healthy than CC's. He's a piece of meat to the Brewers, and that's how they've treated him...

As for Burnett, that one has disaster written all over it. He hasn't earned his contract from Toronto, and now you want to give him even more years at a much larger salary when he's three years older?
I don't understand this here:
CC is a risk at 6 years 20 per, but he could probably get more than that?

If he is a risk, why would teams give him more than that?
Has he ever been a risk before , or are we going off his last 3 months body of work?
Burnett on the other hand has had injuries, but SOME team is going to pay him and look at how dominant he has been recently.
__________________
I'm Deepleft34 and I approve this post.

The answer to any question in the English language:

How about Roberto Alomar? and,
Fixed
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 07:25 PM   #43 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
krunchyfrogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Shermer, Illinois
Posts: 1,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deepleft34 View Post

If he is a risk, why would teams give him more than that?


Uhh, because they want him. Didn't the Mets give Pedro a contract they knew would probably suck in the 4th year (unfortunately for the Mets, he sucked in the 3rd and 4th years)?
__________________
"A life is not important, except in the impact it has on other lives."
-- Jackie Robinson

2008 Mofo 20 Team League Fantasy Baseball Champion!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 07:39 PM   #44 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 683
Default

Cocksucker
__________________
The Cubs would of/have won anyway...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 10:01 PM   #45 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Deepleft34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Wilpons are broke!
Posts: 2,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krunchyfrogg View Post
Uhh, because they want him. Didn't the Mets give Pedro a contract they knew would probably suck in the 4th year (unfortunately for the Mets, he sucked in the 3rd and 4th years)?
It was rhetorical.
__________________
I'm Deepleft34 and I approve this post.

The answer to any question in the English language:

How about Roberto Alomar? and,
Fixed
  Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Don't trade for pitching! FrankStylV7 Mets Archive 172 07-06-2007 02:57 PM
Pitching? What about this guy? elmiets Mets Archive 3 06-26-2007 12:59 PM
Stop Saying It's the Pitching!!! strummer Mets Archive 3 06-14-2007 06:30 PM
No pitching? FrankStylV7 Mets Archive 75 06-12-2007 10:36 AM
Met pitching is a disaster! Phenom Mets Archive 19 04-18-2007 01:36 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:06 PM.


NY Sports Day
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2008 Sportsday Publishing, LLC
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0

NY Sports Day is an independent sports website that is not affiliated with any other news organization. We are not endorsed by or affiliated with the New York Mets, New York Yankees, Major League Baseball, New York Giants, New York Jets, National Football League, New York Knicks, New Jersey Nets, NBA, New York Rangers, New York Islanders, New Jersey Devils, NHL, MSG NJSEA or any other professional sports association or franchise.

For further copyright information click here. For our Terms of Service click here. For our Privacy Statement click here. For the Mets Official Site click here. For the Yankees Official Site click here. For the Giants Official Site click here. For the Jets Official Site click here. For the Knicks Official Site click here. For the Nets Official Site click here. For the Rangers Official Site click here. For the Islanders Official Site click here. For the Devils Official Site click here. Hockey photos courtesy of Altered States Photos. Used By Permission. Baseball pictures taken by David Whitham. Courtesy of kcmets. Logo by Marcos Batista.


Mortgages | Shares | Loans | Nutritional Supplements | Free Ringtone

Sponsor

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64