| Visit Our Sponsors | |
|
| |||||||
| Visit Our Sponsors | |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Adam has lobby for job, OK?
Posts: 12,086
| |
| | |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Under a rock
Posts: 3,628
| I am sure our stellar offseason moves gave him plenty of reasons to steer clear. Not that we had much to work with, mind you.
__________________ The 1986 record was probably pretty much "clean" unless you consider cocaine, alcohol, sex, and cigarettes to be performance enhancing drugs. - ultramet talking about the '86 Mets |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 752
| My guess is that Santana does want the Mets but the Mets aren't on the Twins list. If the Mets don't have the chips the Twins are interested in, it's moot anyway.
__________________ WWW.MYSPACE.COM/THOSEHIPPOCRITES |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: R.O.C.K. in the U.S.A.
Posts: 13,958
| The Mets charter has an anti-ace stipulation.
__________________ Wilpon is like the Pharoah in the book of Exodus. And God keeps sending plagues upon the Mets fans. This year is either frogs or locusts. |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,649
| From Minn Star Ledger blog: A Twins official this morning confirmed that the club is not pleased with comments made by Yankees senior vice president Hank Steinbrenner about negotiations involving ace lefthander Johan Santana. When asked if he thought the comments constituted tampering, the official replied, “We’re not happy. We’ll deal with this internally.'’ Steinbrenner made his comments on Sunday while threatening to pull out of talks with the Twins over the two-time Cy Young award winner. While charging that the Twins were playing his team against the Red Sox in the Santana sweepstakes, he said the following: “Because as much as I want Santana, and you can make that clear — for his sake, to know that I do want him — but the fact is that I’m not going to play the game,'’ Steinbrenner said. It’s unsure if the Twins will pursue tampering charges, but it’s definitely added even more spice to the Twins attempts to trade Santana. Also on Monday, a person familiar with the Santana negotiations said that the pitcher has NOT demanded to be traded to Boston or New York. Santana apparently has not supplied any list of preferred teams or presented any limitations on where he can be dealt. He does, of course, have a full no-trade clause and would like to agree to a contract extension before agreeing to any deal. But it’s unclear if Santana would resist the Twins’ attempts to trade him once the regular season begins. On Sunday, FoxSports.com reported that Santana has notified the Twins he won’t waive his no-trade clause during the season, which could force a trade this week. |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member | Awesome! The Twins are considering tampering charges! Hank will give MLB a Friday deadline to rule on this if they do... FOX Sports on MSN - MLB - Bowden finally lands his prize Quote:
| |
| |
| |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Metsblog | Chuck | Mets Archive | 15 | 11-30-2007 11:18 AM |
| Metsblog: Gomez for Garza? | mets84 | Mets Archive | 42 | 11-17-2007 01:36 PM |
| Metsblog: Mets interested in Eckstein? | mets84 | Mets Archive | 81 | 10-16-2007 06:58 AM |
| Metsblog: Gagne could cost Gomez | mets84 | Mets Archive | 107 | 07-31-2007 02:58 PM |
| Opinion I agree with via Metsblog | Deleted User | Mets Archive | 6 | 07-27-2007 04:42 PM |