The WAF blog.

[Fonzy13]

Originally Posted by SteveJRogers

Jers, for the Love of GOD, LET IT GO already.

Rogers as the voice of reason. Nice knowing you all, there are four guys on horses knocking on my door.

[SteveJRogers]

Originally Posted by Jersey Shore

son, go back to (within this thread) where it all began.....you can plainly see that I am not the one who initiated these attcks from either KO and NA....When I get punched, I'm going to punch back.

Funny, in another place you seem to shut up pretty quickly when another guy that uses "K" as the first letter of his username called you out.

What, have you met that guy personally, but since you've never met KO or Neil you think it is easier to keep fighting back as anonymous posters or whatever instead of just letting their pokes at you roll off their backs?

[Jersey Shore]

Originally Posted by SteveJRogers

Funny, in another place you seem to shut up pretty quickly when another guy that uses "K" as the first letter of his username called you out.

are you talking about.the Kong character on another forum, who i had never even heard of and who, after being challenged, decided to let it go?

Originally Posted by SteveJRogers

What, have you met that guy personally, but since you've never met KO or Neil you think it is easier to keep fighting back as anonymous posters or whatever instead of just letting their pokes at you roll off their backs?

I've not met anyone on any of these forums......do you mean "my back"?

[Mule]

Disclaimer is up.

As to whether or not Jersey "belongs" (and to be honest, to a lesser matter DDP, who I'm going to start referring to as "Jersey Lite") I think all those involved, protagonists included, will agree it's all about whether his contributions help or hurt the blog. I think in the next week or two that will become apparent, and I'm sure that if it looks like it's not working, Jersey won't have a problem with it. Big Boy rules apply here.

In the meantime, someone can easily write a counterpoint post to Jersey's and feed off the liberalism run amok. Or "a muck" as the case may be.

[SteveJRogers]

First off, DDP, shut up and ignore this message,

Originally Posted by Jersey Shore

are you talking about.the Kong character on another forum, who i had never even heard of and who, after being challenged, decided to let it go?

Funny, to me it seemed the other way around. And he seemed to know an AWFUL LOT about you for someone YOU'VE never heard of.

do you mean "my back"?

Yes I did.

[Jersey Shore]

Originally Posted by SteveJRogers

Funny, to me it seemed the other way around. And he seemed to know an AWFUL LOT about you for someone YOU'VE never heard of.

.

i can't explain how or why things "seem" to you

[Jersey Shore]

Originally Posted by Mule

Disclaimer is up.

As to whether or not Jersey "belongs" (and to be honest, to a lesser matter DDP, who I'm going to start referring to as "Jersey Lite") I think all those involved, protagonists included, will agree it's all about whether his contributions help or hurt the blog. I think in the next week or two that will become apparent, and I'm sure that if it looks like it's not working, Jersey won't have a problem with it. Big Boy rules apply here.

I thought the essence of your blog was to examine 'all things that contributing to the decay ofAmerican civilation", which by definition does not mean liberal or conservative. But, at the end of the day the bat, bal, and the bases belong to others. Its your game and you'll decide who can play and who cannot....and that is certainly fair.

Unfortunately the future for me and my continued presence at your blog, will be in part, left to two posters who not only don't like what I say, but don't llike my internet personality......there will be no pleasing them. No matter what happens, what is posted, their vote will be "its not working". I enjoy discussing, arguing these points and sorry that its the messenger who has become hated, rather than the message that is being debated...... i guess its my fault, but in all honesty I'm hard presseed to remember the exact moment it occured. But it did. So, what does all this mean....I hope you'll let me stay and continue to contribute, but if its no, then yes Mule, Jersey won't have a problem with it

[SteveJRogers]

Jers, I am not going to go so far as to quote that particular thread, but here is how things went down.

First, you reappear on that forum with a "no need to go into why, but thought I'd take a dip into "the pool""

You are welcomed by some members of said forum, some of whom used to be here a LONG time ago in a domain far, far away, not to mention you were a frequent Pool contributor until around 2006 or so.

Then Kong, oh and Jers, do try to keep up he was around these parts in the aforementioned long time ago, domain far, far away times not to mention he is the Joe McDonald of that forum, has his "annoying attention whore poster" sense tingling all over.

Then after you ask why he'd be like that he goes into you saying he doesn't want any **** stirred and damn flat out states that he knows what your story is over HERE! Funny how the internet works huh?

Now I know you kind of had the last word, and he said "Yeah, let's just move on to something else here." but all that to me looks like someone just got told not to do any crap around here, and you saying fine rather than what you do with KO on what seems to be a weekly basis.

Oh and do please keep this convo OUT of that forum.

[SteveJRogers]

Originally Posted by Jersey Shore

I thought the essence of your blog was to examine 'all things that contributing to the decay ofAmerican civilation", which by definition does not mean liberal or conservative. But, at the end of the day the bat, bal, and the bases belong to others. Its your game and you'll decide who can play and who cannot....and that is certainly fair.

Unfortunately the future for me and my continued presence at your blog, will be in part, left to two posters who not only don't like what I say, but don't llike my internet personality......there will be no pleasing them. No matter what happens, what is posted, their vote will be "its not working". I enjoy discussing, arguing these points and sorry that its the messenger who has become hated, rather than the message that is being debated...... i guess its my fault, but in all honesty I'm hard presseed to remember the exact moment it occured. But it did. So, what does all this mean....I hope you'll let me stay and continue to contribute, but if its no, then yes Mule, Jersey won't have a problem with it

All your bases belong to us!

Jers, if you feel that way, by all means, start up a We are NOT ****ed blog to counter act the WAF blog. Get Ambler, DeepLeft, QB, MetBoi, GMG and the rest and do the whole Point-Counter Point deal.

Dude, Alan Colmes WAS on FOX News for a long time. Greta Van Sustran is still on Fox News. There is always a lefty on WABC. Just write well and at the end of the day who cares what KO and NA think about your posts.

[Jersey Shore]

Originally Posted by SteveJRogers

Jers, I am not going to go so far as to quote that particular thread, but here is how things went down.

First, you reappear on that forum with a "no need to go into why, but thought I'd take a dip into "the pool""

You are welcomed by some members of said forum, some of whom used to be here a LONG time ago in a domain far, far away, not to mention you were a frequent Pool contributor until around 2006 or so.

Then Kong, oh and Jers, do try to keep up he was around these parts in the aforementioned long time ago, domain far, far away times not to mention he is the Joe McDonald of that forum, has his "annoying attention whore poster" sense tingling all over.

Then after you ask why he'd be like that he goes into you saying he doesn't want any **** stirred and damn flat out states that he knows what your story is over HERE! Funny how the internet works huh?

Now I know you kind of had the last word, and he said "Yeah, let's just move on to something else here." but all that to me looks like someone just got told not to do any crap around here, and you saying fine rather than what you do with KO on what seems to be a weekly basis.
Oh and do please keep this convo OUT of that forum.

couple of things, I have NO IDEA who or what the aforoementioned poster is htere or was here and I don't care........... the convo was basically thqt I didn't give a crap what he thought, but you will remember it your way, I'll remember it mine. How things "look" to youis of no interest to me

You act as if ""what I do with KO on a weekly basis, is a one way street..takes two to tango Steve-O.

And as far as "cross forums" convos, you need to practice what you preach.....so, why don't you drop this entire thing (in BOTH spots).or to quote YOU..PLEASE DEAR GOD, just let it go.

[SteveJRogers]

And you know what, **** your little pity party over only those two will determine your fate as a contributor. **** those two. Because chances are, the more hits the site gets, the more feedback all contributors will get. The more emails Mule and Fonzy will get, and THAT will be the determining factor. Not two MOFO readers who already have an axe to grind against you.

If 9 people emailed Mule saying "Hey I really disagree with what Jersey says, but I love those segments, keep them coming" you know what, THAT MEANS THE SEGMENT IS WORKING!" Hell, ditto the other way, if people are emailing Mule saying "Boy that Jersey is a real piece of ****." Guess what, it means they are READING what you have to say, they aren't glossing over it.

In other words, the segment IS WORKING! So shut up with your little emo "Two people hate me so I'm taking my ball and going home already" bull **** and put out some more liberal commentaries.

[Jersey Shore]

Originally Posted by SteveJRogers

And you know what, **** your little pity party over only those two will determine your fate as a contributor. **** those two.

reading isn't your strong point is it?

Originally Posted by SteveJRogers

5Because chances are, the more hits the site gets, the more feedback all contributors will get. The more emails Mule and Fonzy will get, and THAT will be the determining factor. Not two MOFO readers who already have an axe to grind against you.

and I believe I siad I hoped that would be the case. I wish someone could expalin to me how one internet personality even devlops an axe to grind against another.

Originally Posted by SteveJRogers

If 9 people emailed Mule saying "Hey I really disagree with what Jersey says, but I love those segments, keep them coming" you know what, THAT MEANS THE SEGMENT IS WORKING!" Hell, ditto the other way, if people are emailing Mule saying "Boy that Jersey is a real piece of ****." Guess what, it means they are READING what you have to say, they aren't glossing over it.

point taken

Originally Posted by SteveJRogers

In other words, the segment IS WORKING! So shut up with your little emo "Two people hate me so I'm taking my ball and going home already" bull **** and put out some more liberal commentaries.

again with the RIF

[Mojo]

Originally Posted by SteveJRogers

Jers, if you feel that way, by all means, start up a We are NOT ****ed blog to counter act the WAF blog. Get Ambler, DeepLeft, QB, MetBoi, GMG and the rest and do the whole Point-Counter Point deal.

Yea, GMG is a real liberal. Way left wing. Good work Steve.

And for the record, just because you found an opportunity to ballwash your tormentors and doesn't make you any less of a sad sack of estrogen.

[SteveJRogers]

Originally Posted by Mojo

Yea, GMG is a real liberal. Way left wing. Good work Steve.

And for the record, just because you found an opportunity to ballwash your tormentors and doesn't make you any less of a sad sack of estrogen.

Eat **** Shitbreak.

[SteveJRogers]

Originally Posted by Mojo

Yea, GMG is a real liberal. Way left wing. Good work Steve.

More going for people who generally are on the opposite side of most conservative arguments around here rather than flat out left wingers.