Quote:
Originally Posted by Jersey Shore  pops?, **** I'm not that old........No, Romney is a dope and would have been an equal disaster, I would have figured it would have been Bobby Jindal or Tim Pawlenty. I thought they would be better choice, I also thought he might consider Huckabee, but that would have been a long, long shot |
Jindal never would have taken it. He doesn't need McCain. In fact he'd have one hell of a lot more to lose than to gain by accepting. Now Jerz, do you hoestly expect me to believe that Tim Pawlenty would have been a wiser choice than Palin?
Now I have to admit I preferred Romney myself as I was hoping he appoint a sort of anchor for his fiscal policy as veep. And yes (sorry KO) I do think it's strange Romney plays the fiscal guru in my mind here but compared to McCain he is. But he'd have been rough in the election. For some reason voters didn't flock to him. The 7 house thing would take over the narrative. He'd have been great after the inaugural, but a little rough in the election. Palin, though is an inspired back-up.
Fantastic for the election and good, solid and competent after the inaugural. Pawlenty would have put everyone to sleep.