View Single Post
Old 06-20-2008, 01:12 PM   #4 (permalink)
mets84
Senior Member
 
mets84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Down by 11 in the 9th inning
Posts: 10,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mex17 View Post
Typical Mets luck, the guy fits for us statistically, but at the same time his attitude is indicative of the problems we are having.
A true "bad break" would be signing him before finding this out.

Besides, take one look at that body and tell me it's going to hold up over six or seven years in LF.

As I said yesterday, I'd love to see the Mets go after Burrell. He makes sense on a lot of levels, even if you throw out the monster walk year he's having.

- Is used to a bitter, bitter fanbase and ravenous media
- Kills lefties and isn't terrible against righties
- Would take him away from the Phillies
- Probably wouldn't have to commit to a billion year contract
- Has been relatively durable/reliable

One of Minaya's problems seems to be surrounding top-shelf talent (Santana, Wright, Reyes, etc.) with ancient, injured dogshit. I appreciate his apprehension when it comes to committing dollars and years to good talent that's just barely on the wrong side of 30... but the Mets have the money, and at some point (hopefully this offseason) they should overpay to bring in the solid talent that's reliably good and maybe a little older (instead of hit-or-miss and ancient), even if it's not a long-term solution.
__________________
Quote:
Privately, the Mets believe they scored enough runs last season (799, tied for second in the NL with the Phillies). Unless they can pull off an unlikely trade of Luis Castillo and add free agent Orlando Hudson to play second base, the likely move is to add a backup infielder such as Alex Cora.
799 runs is enough. Don't score a run more.

Last edited by mets84 : 06-20-2008 at 01:18 PM. Reason: Looked it up, and the Mets actually do better against LHP... but I'd still rather have Burrell than Dunn
  Reply With Quote

Want fewer adverts? -Join NY Sportsday's Forums