Comments on: Sorry If I Don’t Get Excited About Gaborik http://www.nysportsday.com/2009/07/02/sorry-if-i-dont-get-excited-about-gaborik/ Independent Gotham Sports Coverage Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:02:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Derek http://www.nysportsday.com/2009/07/02/sorry-if-i-dont-get-excited-about-gaborik/comment-page-1/#comment-363 Derek Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:12:36 +0000 http://www.nysportsday.com/?p=3759#comment-363 I can understand your skepticism as it's been coming from other fans as well. But would you rather them have paid the house for Heatley? My only beef is that it's not more incentive-laden. Other than that, I'm fine with it cause realistically speaking, they needed a go-to guy who's in their prime. And well, they're not contending this season. Once Grachev, Stepan and our blueline prospects get acclimated, I believe they'll be a serious challenger. I can understand your skepticism as it’s been coming from other fans as well. But would you rather them have paid the house for Heatley?

My only beef is that it’s not more incentive-laden. Other than that, I’m fine with it cause realistically speaking, they needed a go-to guy who’s in their prime. And well, they’re not contending this season. Once Grachev, Stepan and our blueline prospects get acclimated, I believe they’ll be a serious challenger.

]]> By: fern http://www.nysportsday.com/2009/07/02/sorry-if-i-dont-get-excited-about-gaborik/comment-page-1/#comment-360 fern Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:51:01 +0000 http://www.nysportsday.com/?p=3759#comment-360 Same can be said for the Mets -- looks good on paper, but it never translates to the field. Same can be said for the Mets — looks good on paper, but it never translates to the field.

]]>